Hey there!
Thanks for answering on this thread.
Let me clarify here our recent statement of not doing groups in groups.
In fact, we STILL want to implement a solution to let you accomplish all of these advanced use cases, but we don't think a generic solution allowing groups in groups is the first thing to do.
We observed that in 80% of cases, the "nested" content is very similar (lists of images, lists of links, lists of tags etc..). The other 20% are more complex like list of cards in tabs for example.
We want to start (and we are starting now) with the 80% first, offering a nice way to do simple lists, for the most common use cases. And these of course will be able to be put in a group.
I hope this helps understand our vision. But I repeat, we do want to let you model these use cases.
Best,
Côme